Explaining a controversial incident

The guidelines suggest being concise and only asking when needed. I want to offer context about the 1998 Juventus vs Inter incident where Iuliano collided with Ronaldo in the box. Many felt it was a clear penalty, but referee Ceccarini waved it off. Immediately afterward, Juventus got a penalty. Since there's no VAR back then, Iuliano recently mentioned it still wouldn’t be called a penalty. I’ll check harness and sandbox details to provide a brief analysis and context, possibly in Chinese.Recalling the Juventus vs Inter incident

I want to avoid claims requiring browsing, so I’ll rely on common knowledge. The match date is April 26, 1998, with Juventus winning 1-0 against Inter, thanks to a goal by Del Piero. In the second half, there was a controversial incident when Juventus received a penalty that was saved. This game was crucial for the 97-98 Serie A title, and many felt the contact should've been a clear penalty. It's notable that even the Italian parliament discussed it!Discussing VAR and penalties

I want to keep things accurate and general, avoiding any risk of inaccuracies. The VAR protocol mentions that a clear and obvious error could prompt a review if there's evidence of a foul. Replays suggest that Iuliano impeded Ronaldo, which would likely be a penalty by today's standards. However, Iuliano claims it wouldn't be a penalty even with VAR. It’s good to consider both sides: did Ronaldo initiate contact or was it shoulder-to-shoulder? I should ask the user if they want commentary, background, or a legal perspective.Crafting a concise answer

I need to create a clear response. First, I’ll paraphrase the quote in one sentence. Then, I'll provide some brief context about the famous 1998 Juve–Inter incident and why it’s notable. Next, I’ll explain the VAR perspective, highlighting what VAR can and can't do, especially focusing on "clear and obvious" errors. I'll present both sides of the argument. Finally, I'll ask if the user wants a deeper analysis with clips, noting I can break down frame-by-frame but don’t have video. I might include a quick question in Chinese about the controversy, ensuring the format is light with 4-6 bullet points.